One of the shortcomings of this approach is how .NET handles the serialization of subclasses. To illustrate this, lets take a quick look at a configuration file I developed for an data processing service I was working on recently. The service allowed the user to configure jobs that ran on a scheduled basis, performed configurable data searches against a remote database, transformed the data, and than ran the data through one or more output plug-ins. These plug-ins allowed perform a variety of different actions on the retrieved data. Each output plug-in needed different configuration object, since it did different things. The service architecture allowed us to write new plug-ins as needed to perform custom integration tasks for specific clients without needed to release a new version of the app.
The architecture of the output system is pretty simple: configuration classes all implement the same IOutputPluginConfig interface and we used a simple factory class to instantiate the corresponding IOutputPlugin classes from their saved config. This means that each persistent job configuration class had a property like this:
1: public SerializableList<IOutputConfig> Outputs
2: {
3: get { return m_Outputs; }
4: set { m_Outputs = value; }
5: }
6: private SerializableList<IOutputConfig> m_Outputs;
This list might contain several different output configuration types.
Now, .NET will serialize this list of IOutputConfig objects to disk just fine, but on loading the configuration it will fail, since it doesn't know what classes to create for each saved XML output configuration element.
There is a built-in mechanism to resolve this problem; using the XmlArrayItemAttribute you can specified all the subclasses that should be deserialized.
1: [XmlArrayItem(typeof(EmailOutputConfig)),
2: XmlArrayItem(typeof(DiskOutputConfig)),
3: XmlArrayItem(typeof(SharepointOutputConfig)),]
4: public List<IOutputConfig> Outputs;
This didn't really suit my need for two reasons:
- Its messy and breaks encapsulation. We are leaking knowledge of the subclasses upwards, which is bad design. New implementations of outputs would have to modify the attribute in the library classes.
- Since we are implementing new functionality via plugin-ins (which are loaded dynamically), we don't know the full list of possible subclasses at compile time and thus can't list them in the attribute, even if we were willing to hold our noses and do so.
The approach I used was to implement two custom classes, ISerializableList and ISerializableDictionary. These classes implement IXmlSerializable to wrap each of the subclasses in an
1: <Outputs>
2: <Item type="APP.Output.DiskOutputConfig, APPDAC">
3: <Disk>
4: <BasePath>c:\test\exrs\two\</BasePath>
5: <PathPattern>{DATESTAMP}_{TIMESTAMP}</PathPattern>
6: <OverwriteFile>true</OverwriteFile>
7: </Disk>
8: </Item>
9: <Item type="APP.Output.DiskOutputConfig, APPDAC">
10: <Email>
11: <SMTPServer>127.0.0.1</SMTPServer>
12: <Recipient>a@test.com</Recipient>
13: <Recipient>b@test.com</Recipient>
14: <FilePattern>{DATESTAMP}_{TIMESTAMP}</FilePattern>
15: </Email>
16: </Item>
17: </Outputs>
One of the points to note is that I am stripping the assembly version info from the saved type name. This was to avoid version changes in the asembly causing load errors. For major schema changes I would need to implement another set of classes anyway, so as to be able to have both loaded at once for translation.
Here is the full code for both classes and well as a link to a project you can use directly.
1: [Serializable]
2: public class SerializableList<TValue>
3: : List<TValue>, IXmlSerializable
4: {
5: #region IXmlSerializable Members
6:
7: public XmlSchema GetSchema()
8: {
9: return null;
10: }
11:
12: public void ReadXml(XmlReader reader)
13: {
14: bool wasEmpty = reader.IsEmptyElement;
15: reader.Read();
16: if (wasEmpty)
17: return;
18:
19: while (reader.NodeType != XmlNodeType.EndElement)
20: {
21: string StateTypeDescriptor = reader.GetAttribute("type");
22: Type StateType = Type.GetType(StateTypeDescriptor);
23:
24: reader.ReadStartElement();
25: XmlSerializer valueSerializer = new XmlSerializer(StateType);
26: this.Add((TValue)valueSerializer.Deserialize(reader));
27:
28: reader.ReadEndElement();
29: reader.MoveToContent();
30: }
31: reader.ReadEndElement();
32: }
33:
34: public void WriteXml(XmlWriter writer)
35: {
36: foreach (TValue item in this)
37: {
38: Type ValueType = item.GetType();
39: XmlSerializer valueSerializer = new XmlSerializer(ValueType);
40: string SubElementName = "Item";
41:
42: writer.WriteStartElement(SubElementName);
43:
44: writer.WriteStartAttribute("type");
45: writer.WriteString(Serialization.GetTypeName(ValueType));
46: writer.WriteEndAttribute();
47:
48: valueSerializer.Serialize(writer, item);
49:
50: writer.WriteEndElement();
51: }
52: }
53:
54: #endregion
55:
56: }
1: [Serializable]
2: public class SerializableDictionary<TKey, TValue>
3: : Dictionary<TKey, TValue>, IXmlSerializable
4: {
5: #region IXmlSerializable Members
6: public XmlSchema GetSchema()
7: {
8: return null;
9: }
10:
11: public void ReadXml(XmlReader reader)
12: {
13: XmlSerializer keySerializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(TKey));
14:
15: bool wasEmpty = reader.IsEmptyElement;
16: reader.Read();
17: if (wasEmpty)
18: return;
19:
20: while (reader.NodeType != System.Xml.XmlNodeType.EndElement)
21: {
22: string StateTypeDescriptor = reader.GetAttribute("type");
23: Type StateType = Type.GetType(StateTypeDescriptor);
24: XmlSerializer valueSerializer = new XmlSerializer(StateType);
25:
26: reader.ReadToFollowing("key");
27: reader.ReadStartElement("key");
28: TKey key = (TKey)keySerializer.Deserialize(reader);
29: reader.ReadEndElement();
30:
31: reader.ReadStartElement("value");
32: TValue value = (TValue)valueSerializer.Deserialize(reader);
33: reader.ReadEndElement();
34:
35: this.Add(key, value);
36: reader.ReadEndElement();
37: }
38:
39: reader.ReadEndElement();
40: }
41:
42: public void WriteXml(System.Xml.XmlWriter writer)
43: {
44: // the keys can't be subclassed,only the values can
45: XmlSerializer keySerializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(TKey));
46:
47: foreach (TKey key in this.Keys)
48: {
49: TValue value = this[key];
50: Type ValueType = this[key].GetType();
51: XmlSerializer valueSerializer = new XmlSerializer(ValueType);
52:
53: writer.WriteStartElement("item");
54: writer.WriteStartAttribute("type");
55: writer.WriteString(Serialization.GetTypeName(ValueType));
56: writer.WriteEndAttribute();
57:
58: // serialize the key
59: writer.WriteStartElement("key");
60: keySerializer.Serialize(writer, key);
61: writer.WriteEndElement();
62: writer.WriteStartElement("value");
63: valueSerializer.Serialize(writer, value);
64: writer.WriteEndElement();
65:
66: writer.WriteEndElement();
67: }
68: }
69: #endregion
70: }
71:
1: namespace Pragmatix.Serialization
2: {
3: public class Serialization
4: {
5:
6: public static string GetTypeName(Type t)
7: {
8: string ClassName = t.FullName;
9: string SimpleAssembly = t.Assembly.FullName.Split(new string[] {","}, StringSplitOptions.RemoveEmptyEntries)[0];
10: return ClassName + ", " + SimpleAssembly;
11: }
12: }
13: }
Source code
5 comments:
Hi,
Just wondering where Serialization.GetTypeName() is? Is this a static helper class that is not shown in the example, or is it in some deep dark corner of .Net that I have not yet explored?
:-)
Thanks
Sorry about that, that is a custom class.
I'm modifying the class name to avoid outputting the full assembly name, with version info. Basically I want:
Name.Space.ClassName, Assembly
not
Name.Space.ClassName, Assembly, Version=x.x.x, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=yyyyyyyyyyy.
I wanted to be able to version my assemblies without worrying about conflicts when loading the class, especially for dynamically loaded code like plug-ins.
I've added the class to the blog post.
Hotel & Casino in WV - Mapyro
Find 하남 출장마사지 the best and 충주 출장안마 cheapest way to get from 과천 출장안마 Mardi Gras Casino to Harrah's Casino? Find 김포 출장샵 the cheapest 여수 출장안마 and quickest ways to get from Mardi Gras Casino to
The recreation is laid out precisely like the TV present and there’s plenty of enjoyable available. This version of the traditional board recreation will offer you the last word|the final word} enjoyable issue. Watch as the supplier turns the wheel on the digital board, and hold your fingers crossed for the 4 dice rolls. The bonus round of this recreation is out of 토토사이트 this world, as a 3D Mr Monopoly will hop around the board and probably deal out his prizes.
Playing free of charge is great, especially if you haven't mastered the fundamentals of the sport but. Making a deposit is easy, and Jackpot City Casino provides trusted and reliable banking choices. In order to boost your chances of winning you'll be able to|you possibly can} claim bonuses when you play on-line slots for real cash. From the second you join 원 엑스 벳 the casino and also you make your first deposit you'll start receiving provides on a daily, weekly, and month-to-month foundation. You will instantly turn into a member of the Jackpot City participant loyalty club. The casino’s ambiance is welcoming and pleasant, with an actual concentrate on to} having enjoyable.
Post a Comment